OpenAI o1, AKA Strawberry, appears to be a significant advance, but its ‘chain of thought’ should be made public knowledge
It’s nearly two years since OpenAI released ChatGPT on an unsuspecting world, and the world, closely followed by the stock market, lost its mind. All over the place, people were wringing their hands wondering: What This Will Mean For [enter occupation, industry, business, institution].
Within academia, for example, humanities professors agonised about how they would henceforth be able to grade essays if students were using ChatGPT or similar technology to help write them. The answer, of course, is to come up with better ways of grading, because students will use these tools for the simple reason that it would be idiotic not to – just as it would be daft to do budgeting without spreadsheets. But universities are slow-moving beasts and even as I write, there are committees in many ivory towers solemnly trying to formulate “policies on AI use”.
Continue reading…
{Categories} _Category: Takes{/Categories}
{URL}https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/sep/28/openai-o1-strawberry-chain-of-thought-chatgpt{/URL}
{Author}John Naughton{/Author}
{Image}https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/9c0f4817059ac04f711ac54d56eaabaa6203147b/0_2_4000_2400/master/4000.jpg?width=465&dpr=1&s=none{/Image}
{Keywords}Artificial intelligence (AI),Technology,Computing,OpenAI,ChatGPT{/Keywords}
{Source}POV{/Source}
{Thumb}{/Thumb}